Like my
approach electronic gadgets (discussed in Technology in my Pocket), my relationship
with so-called ‘social networking media’ such as Facebook is riddled with
contradictions. Facebook in particular scares me with its unhealthy power and
ubiquity. It requires and promotes the use of yet more planet-guzzling
electronic equipment, as well as augmenting that invisible cloud of wi-fi waves,
mobile phone radiation and GPS signals which constantly bombards our fragile cells. I don’t know whether to consider it
symptomatic or emblematic of all that is wrong with our current society, but I
think it is dangerous and damaging to human relationships, communication skills
and literacy. And I am completely hooked and check my account several times a
day.
Again, as
with technology, I didn’t jump onto the bandwagon easily. Back in another time
and place, we had just finished painstakingly constructing our website for our
amateur rock band, when suddenly nobody had websites anymore – everyone had
Myspace pages (remember that?) No sooner had I got to grips with the friend
requests and emoticons of Myspace, than I started receiving invitations to join
this weird thing called Facebook. I resisted a long time, and then finally
caved in and set up an account, early one Saturday morning, for no good reason (for
some reason I remember this – I believe I was still in my dressing gown). That
was the rest of the morning gone, and many, many hours since (although not as
many as my Other Half likes to believe).
I have some
genuine uses and excuses for Facebook. I live in a different country to most of
my family and many friends, so it enables me to more easily keep in regular
contact with more people, and provides a means of communicating and sharing in
my native tongue. As many on my friends list are from school or university
days, we are of the same generation, and are moving through life-changing
events at roughly the same pace; as parenthood started kicking in, it was
surprisingly useful to share gripes, worries, empathy and experiences with
people I haven’t spoken to face-to-face (as opposed to face-to-facebook) for
many years, and across a diverse network of people who have all known me, in
some time, place and context, but don’t necessarily know each other.
But I sense
that the current dominance of ‘networking’ format tools for communication is
changing the nature of human interaction, and not in a healthy way. Once upon a
time, if I wanted to get or keep in touch with someone, I wrote them a letter
(later an email), composed and addressed for them specifically. (Okay, so bulk
mail-shots and email lists are possible, and have their place – although I
remember my mother’s dislike of receiving bulk generic letters from
acquaintances with the Christmas cards, with the only personal touch being our
names inked in at the top). With Facebook and the like, the author is the narcissistic
centre of their “net” – the communication becomes much more one-sided, more about
the author only. I can follow the lives of people I was at school with, or met
once on a course years ago, without ever actually exchanging a direct word with
them. (In truth, if it weren’t for facebook, I would have probably never had
any contact with many of these people ever again in my life). I post about me
- how I am feeling, a complaint or
idea I have, something I find funny or interesting and would like to share –
but I just put it out there for others to make of it what they will, or ignore.
Of course,
it is easy to show appreciation for a post by simply clicking the convenient
“like” button, or to ‘share’ a particularly humorous or philosophical post on
our own timelines/newsfeeds in order to bask in a little reflected glory. It is
easy to add a ‘comment’, and maybe even start a bit of a discussion with
friends of friends of the initial poster (I once had a dinging argument, comment-by-comment,
with a guy I have never met who had put a bigoted, racist comment to something
a mutual friend had posted, that I simply couldn’t let lie). But does any of
this count as real communication? Is it damaging our facility to react with
anything more complex than click-on opinions and typed one-liners?
I
appreciate it when people share funny stuff, because I like to laugh;
thought-provoking or socially aware stuff, because it makes me think;
informative stuff, because I like to learn; personal news, because after all,
all of these people were part of my life at some point, and it’s nice to keep
up with what’s become of them. But I’m sure I am not alone in having ‘friends’
that also share their most inane thoughts and actions; photos of their cats or
their lunch; umpteen ‘must-see-it-will-change-your-life’ videos; blow-by-blow
accounts of illnesses circulating their families or their own bodies; every
move they make (aided by the handy in-phone GPS functions). And the need to
share all this, in my opinion, has gone far beyond conviviality amongst friends,
to become a compulsion in its own right. For some, it seems, the priority is no
longer to experience life, but to share it on Facebook.
Of course,
I’m not obliged to read it, let alone comment it, “like” it or share it. If I
don’t want to be bugged by people’s Facebook behaviour, it’s my responsibility
to resist logging on. But the fact that all this is even possible, and seems to
have become rather normal, adds to that specific type of worrying that
is the subject of this blog. This move towards ever-more egocentric forms of
communication can only lead humanity further down the road of its own
destruction.
“But does any of this (Facebook etc) count as REAL communication?” (my caps)
ReplyDeleteYeah, so what is ‘communication’? Does it have to be face-to-face? One-to-one? Is there a hierarchy of the means of communication? Why should it somehow be ‘better’ face-to-face than via a social network?
My take on this is that I communicate best with people I know and trust. At the top of my hierarchy of communication is being able to lay yourself open to others, knowing that (hopefully) you will be forgiven/understood/ridiculed/criticized/whatever – but that none of that will undermine the relationship you have with the other. Whatever the two of you say will of course change the nature of that relationship but will not affect its solidity.
So if this kind of communication is (in my ideal world) what I want to give and receive from others, then social media play no part in it. Because it can only be done one-to-one, whether via phone/email/physical contact.
To take the above onto a more social level, I imagine that there are a lot of people out there like me: Facebook is good for sharing things that you feel happy about sharing. From your blog: To keep in touch with someone you wrote a letter/email “composed and addressed for them specifically”. (But was this (is this?) means of communication less narcissistic than Facebook is now? Letters to individuals/letters at Christmas To All Family and Friends are mainly about the sender …) However, the hidden stuff, the stuff you sometimes have to drag out of yourself, that needs the patient questioning of another, all that needs a different medium.
Maybe my question about ‘hierarchies’ at the beginning of this comment is irrelevant: there is no hierarchy, just different ways to get your message over, to hear the message of others.
I appreciate the fact that you prioritise the people doing the communicating - the relationship between them etc. I think my mistake is to get hung up on the medium of communication. Maybe interactions/relationships of the "ideal" qualities you mention do not necessarily have to be face-to-face, but can also use - or be exclusively, you never know - by phone or email. Your comment highlights (more concisely than my entire blog post rant) the difference between these media and social networking: the "network" aspect makes it one-to-many, rather than one-to-one, and so as you say it simply cannot be used to maintain your 'ideal' type of relationship.
DeleteI still maintain, though, that this one-to-many format renders the communciation even more narcissistic than any form of one-to-one communciation, but equal to the annoying "To All Family and Friends" Christmas mailouts. Most interactions are often more narcissistic than we realise or admit - I know full well I talk about myself far too much during so-called "conversations" on the phone, for example - but the social networking media exacerbate this, make it accepted, even necessary, the norm, and I think this can only distort the nature of human interaction.